AvnishYadav
WorkProjectsBlogsNewsletterSupportAbout
Work With Me

Avnish Yadav

Engineer. Automate. Build. Scale.

© 2026 Avnish Yadav. All rights reserved.

The Automation Update

AI agents, automation, and micro-SaaS. Weekly.

Explore

  • Home
  • Projects
  • Blogs
  • Newsletter Archive
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy

Connect

LinkedInGitHubInstagramYouTube
Create Your First AI Planning Agent in 10 Minutes (n8n Tutorial)
2026-02-14

Create Your First AI Planning Agent in 10 Minutes (n8n Tutorial)

8 min readAI AutomationTutorialsProductivityautomationn8nai-agentsopenaiworkflow-automationplanningproductivitytutorialai-automation

Learn to build an AI-powered planning agent with n8n that automatically decomposes goals into executable tasks using structured prompting and workflow automation.

Why Build an AI Planning Agent?

As developers and creators, we constantly juggle complex projects that require systematic breakdown. Traditional planning tools rely on manual decomposition, which is time-consuming and often inconsistent. An AI planning agent automates this cognitive work—transforming high-level goals into structured action plans with clear dependencies and next steps.

This isn't just another chatbot. We're building a deterministic planning system that uses structured prompting to ensure consistent, actionable outputs. The agent will take ambiguous objectives like "Build a landing page" and output specific, ordered tasks: "1. Design wireframe, 2. Write copy, 3. Implement HTML/CSS, 4. Add analytics."

Prerequisites & Setup

Before we dive into the workflow, ensure you have:

  • An n8n instance (cloud or self-hosted)
  • OpenAI API key (or compatible LLM provider)
  • Basic familiarity with n8n nodes

We'll use the HTTP Request node for API calls and Code node for data transformation, keeping dependencies minimal.

The Core Planning Prompt

The intelligence of our agent lives in its prompt structure. Here's the exact system prompt that ensures consistent planning behavior:

You are a professional project planning assistant. Your task is to break down complex goals into actionable, sequential steps.

Rules:

  1. Always output in valid JSON format
  2. Structure: {"goal": "original goal", "tasks": [{"id": 1, "description": "task", "estimated_time": "minutes", "dependencies": []}]}
  3. Tasks must be specific, executable actions
  4. Include time estimates in minutes
  5. Note dependencies where one task requires another
  6. Maximum 8 tasks per goal

Example input: "Create a newsletter system"
Example output: {"goal": "Create a newsletter system", "tasks": [{"id": 1, "description": "Design email template in HTML", "estimated_time": "45", "dependencies": []}, {"id": 2, "description": "Set up mailing list database schema", "estimated_time": "30", "dependencies": []}]}

This prompt enforces JSON output, limits scope creep, and ensures practical task breakdowns. The dependency tracking creates implicit sequencing for the workflow.

Building the n8n Workflow

Our workflow consists of three main nodes:

  1. Webhook node: Receives planning requests (goal input)
  2. HTTP Request node: Calls OpenAI API with our structured prompt
  3. Code node: Validates and formats the response

Configure the HTTP Request node with:

  • Method: POST
  • URL: https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions
  • Headers: Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY
  • Body: {"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "[SYSTEM_PROMPT_HERE]"}, {"role": "user", "content": "{{$json.goal}}"}]}

The Code node should parse the response and handle edge cases:

javascript
const response = $input.first().json;

try {
const content = response.choices[0].message.content;
const parsed = JSON.parse(content);

// Validate structure
if (!parsed.tasks || !Array.isArray(parsed.tasks)) {
throw new Error('Invalid task structure');
}

return parsed;
} catch (error) {
// Fallback to manual decomposition
return {
goal: $json.goal,
tasks: [
{id: 1, description: "Break down goal into subtasks manually", estimated_time: "15", dependencies: []}
]
};
}

Testing & Iteration

Test your agent with varied inputs:

  • "Plan a product launch"
  • "Automate social media posting"
  • "Build a customer feedback system"

Evaluate outputs based on:

  1. Actionability: Can someone execute the task immediately?
  2. Sequencing: Do dependencies create logical flow?
  3. Time realism: Are estimates reasonable?

If tasks are too vague, add specificity requirements to your prompt. If sequencing is off, strengthen dependency instructions.

Production Enhancements

Once your basic agent works, consider these upgrades:

  • Add memory: Store past plans in a database node to reference similar goals
  • Multi-agent coordination: Chain planning agent with research and validation agents
  • Human-in-the-loop: Add approval nodes for critical plans
  • Integration: Connect to project management tools (Notion, Trello, Jira) via their APIs

The planning agent becomes truly powerful when integrated into your existing toolchain—automatically creating tickets, calendar events, or documentation from generated plans.

Common Pitfalls & Solutions

Problem: LLM returns non-JSON responses.
Solution: Add stricter formatting instructions and implement robust error handling in the Code node.

Problem: Tasks are too generic.
Solution: Add examples of specific vs. vague tasks in your prompt: "Specific: 'Install PostgreSQL v15', Vague: 'Set up database'"

Problem: Time estimates are unrealistic.
Solution: Provide anchor estimates: "Writing 500 words = 30 minutes, Simple API endpoint = 60 minutes"

Next Steps

You now have a functional AI planning agent that can decompose complex goals in seconds. This foundation enables numerous automation possibilities:

  • Connect to calendar APIs to schedule tasks automatically
  • Add priority scoring based on deadlines and resources
  • Create specialized planners for different domains (content, development, marketing)
  • Build a library of plan templates for recurring projects

The true value emerges when you stop planning manually and let the agent handle the cognitive overhead, freeing you to focus on execution.

Share

Comments

Loading comments...

Add a comment

By posting a comment, you’ll be subscribed to the newsletter. You can unsubscribe anytime.

0/2000